Beyond the Obvious: Integrating Sustainability into Every Project Plan
April 23, 2025

A stylized illustration of a green and blue globe surrounded by interconnected icons representing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors such as a leaf, a gear, a wind turbine, and a growth chart. It symbolizes a holistic approach to sustainability in global innovation.
The recent revelation from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman regarding the surprising energy costs associated with user interactions with ChatGPT (Altman, as cited in The Economic Times, 2025) offers a profound lesson for project managers across all sectors. It starkly illustrates that even in seemingly intangible "soft" projects, environmental impacts can be significant and often unforeseen. This isn't just an anecdote about AI; it's a powerful case study demonstrating the limitations of traditional project planning that may not fully account for the lifecycle environmental footprint of our deliverables and the systems they inhabit. As we strive for a greener future through Sustainable Project Management, this example compels us to learn from past oversights and evolve our methodologies to be more holistic and anticipatory.
Learning from the AI Example: A Lens for Future Green PM
The ChatGPT scenario isn't just about the energy consumption of AI; it's a critical "lesson learned" in the evolving landscape of Sustainable Project Management. Here's how we can interpret it through that lens:
The Blind Spot of Indirect Impacts: Historically, "green" efforts in project management have often focused on direct, tangible impacts like material waste or emissions from construction. The AI example highlights a significant blind spot: the indirect environmental costs embedded in the infrastructure and usage patterns of "soft" projects. A key lesson is the need to proactively identify and quantify these indirect impacts, even if they aren't immediately obvious.
The Importance of Anticipatory Planning: The fact that user politeness significantly impacted energy consumption suggests a failure to fully anticipate the long-term and widespread effects of user interaction on the underlying infrastructure. For Green Project Management, this underscores the need for more sophisticated lifecycle assessments and scenario planning that consider a broader range of variables, including user behavior and technological dependencies.
Cross-Disciplinary Learning and Collaboration: The solution to the energy challenges of AI requires collaboration between AI developers ("Green AI"), infrastructure engineers, and sustainability experts. Similarly, for all projects aiming for sustainability, breaking down silos and fostering communication across disciplines is a crucial "lesson learned" from past, potentially siloed, "green" initiatives. Project managers are uniquely positioned to facilitate this collaboration.
Evolving Metrics of Success: Traditional project success metrics often focus on time, budget, and scope. The AI example suggests the need to incorporate environmental performance indicators more explicitly, even for "soft" projects. This "lesson learned" from the growing awareness of digital sustainability should drive the development of new KPIs related to energy efficiency, resource utilization, and lifecycle impact across all project types.
Conclusion: A Sustainable Mindset for All Projects
The surprising energy implications of AI usage, exemplified by the ChatGPT case, offer a valuable, albeit unexpected, set of "lessons learned" for the field of Sustainable Project Management. They underscore the necessity of moving beyond traditional boundaries and adopting a more comprehensive, lifecycle-oriented approach to environmental stewardship in all our projects. By proactively identifying indirect impacts, anticipating long-term consequences, fostering cross-disciplinary collaboration, and evolving our metrics of success, we can apply these crucial lessons to build a future where sustainability is not just an add-on but an inherent principle guiding every project we undertake, tangible or intangible.
Citation:
Altman, S. (2025, April 22). Do you say 'Please' to ChatGPT? Sam Altman reveals how much electricity your manners cost to OpenAI. The Economic Times. Retrieved from https://m.economictimes.com/magazines/panache/do-you-say-please-to-chatgpt-sam-altman-reveals-how-much-electricity-your-manners-cost-to-openai/articleshow/120455018.cms
